Balcony restoration: What condominium building owners should expect during construction

Building and Structural Restoration Balconies

How to minimize disruption and keep residents informed during a balcony restoration project

Balcony restoration represents both a challenge and an opportunity for condominium communities. It’s an important investment in the performance of the building, but it’s more than likely that its activities will disrupt existing residents.

Balcony restoration happens directly outside residents’ homes. They unwillingly live on the front lines of construction activities – dust and vibrations from jackhammering, interruptions from inspections and measurement taking and swing stages going up and down the wall past their units, become part of their new reality. There may be moments when progress isn’t obvious from the outside, leaving those residents frustrated.

The best way to stave off those frustrations is with effective planning, communication and expectation setting for residents.

Before construction begins

By the time a contractor is awarded the project, owners and tenants have usually seen engineers inspecting balconies and know repairs are coming. Once the tender closes, many expect construction to begin immediately.

However, there’s often a delay before crews arrive on site as contracts are finalized, permits are attainted, shop drawings reviewed and materials ordered.

Residents want to understand where the project stands, when work is expected to start and what they’ll need to do before construction begins.

By the time a contractor is awarded the project, owners and tenants have usually seen engineers inspecting balconies and know repairs are coming.

Preparing for the balcony restoration

One of the first steps in any condominium balcony restoration project is clearing the balconies.

Management needs to communicate when items like furniture, planters, flooring and other personal belongings need to be removed before work begins. This may be a simple task for some residents, while others may need extra time, or even assistance. Communicating these requirements early helps avoid delays once construction starts.

Once the balconies are cleared, access will be restricted until the work is complete, a necessity for everyone’s safety. This needs to be clearly communicated with a post on balcony doors.

Why construction seems to stop and start

Resident expectations of project progress may not align with the realities of a given project.

Balcony restoration is carried out in phases. First comes demolition and removal of guards, followed by inspections to confirm repair areas are properly prepared. Concrete repairs require curing time before waterproofing can begin, and waterproofing must cure before new guards can be installed.

Additionally, every phase needs to go through an inspection before the next one can begin. During those gaps between active construction work, residents may see this as progress being stalled, though this isn’t the case. Clear communication about project phasing can ease tensions that may arise from any misunderstandings.

Expect interruptions, like noise and weather delays

The most common resident complaints during balcony restoration arise because of noise and delays.

Concrete removal creates vibration that can be felt in neighbouring units, and the sound can travel farther than people expect. Providing residents with advance notice of noisy work helps them plan around it.

Weather also plays a bigger role than many people realize. Concrete can’t be poured in the rain. Waterproofing can’t be applied to wet surfaces. Extreme heat may shorten workdays.

It can look like nothing is happening, but often, the pros are simply waiting for the right conditions to move forward.

101 Kathleen Street: Restoring balconies of occupied units

It’s a point of pride that Pretium Engineering minimizes disruption while residents remain in place using clear, proactive communication throughout multifamily construction projects.

In the case of 101 Kathleen Street in Whitby, our team provided building enclosure consulting for the restoration of a six-storey, 120-unit condominium that was constructed in 1979.

The project included balcony concrete repairs and waterproofing, replacement of aging metal picket guards with modern aluminum and tinted glass guard systems, and an EIFS retrofit designed to improve building aesthetics and the thermal performance of the exterior wall and window assemblies.

It’s a point of pride that Pretium Engineering minimizes disruption while residents remain in place using clear, proactive communication throughout multifamily construction projects.

Because the building remained fully occupied throughout construction, careful coordination was critical. Our team collaborated with the contractor to phase the work, communicate milestones and manage resident expectations. By establishing clear communication channels from project outset and providing regular updates, we minimized both disruptions and impacts on residents.

The completed restoration delivered safer, more functional balconies, enhanced the building’s appearance and reduced energy costs by improving the overall performance of the building envelope.

Opening the balconies

To ensure everyone’s safety, balconies will be reopened in phases, once inspections have been completed and any deficiencies have been addressed.

While residents are naturally eager to get their outdoor space back, it’s better to wait for contractor confirmation than to promise a reopening date that may change.

The goal of balcony restoration is twofold: to revive a valued building amenity while causing as little disruption as possible. When technical expertise is matched with thoughtful planning and proactive communication, the result is a project that protects both the building and the resident experience.

Published on July 29, 2026

Why Roof Performance and Resilience Matters More Than Ever in the Climate-Change Era

Building and Structural Restoration

Prioritizing Roof Performance Over Secondary Uses is Key for Structures Enduring Through Climate Change

Climate change is reshaping how buildings, and their roofs, perform.

The decisions engineers/consultants, institutional and commercial building owners, and property managers make today regarding both new construction and retrofits will directly impact a structure’s ability to withstand climate-related risks into the future.

Roofs are a building’s first line of defence against the elements, and they must be constructed to withstand higher wind loads, heavier rainfall, and more frequent freeze-thaw cycles. As a result, roof resilience is rapidly becoming a critical risk management and asset protection issue.

This creates a design tension, as ancillary roof uses become more popular. Building designers and project teams are often pressured to prioritize secondary roof uses or cost savings over long-term roof performance.

Green/vegetated roofs, solar photovoltaic arrays, water retention systems, communications infrastructure, and rooftop amenity spaces all add value by mitigating climate impacts, supporting sustainability goals, and creating functional spaces.

However, these benefits come with increased roof loads and long-term performance risks if roof systems are not designed with resilience top of mind.

The Argument for Prioritizing Roof Performance

Roofs must perform over the long term, remaining securely in place, preventing leaks during high winds and heavy precipitation, and maintaining occupant comfort. When roof systems fall short of these objectives, the resulting failures are often expensive and disruptive to fix.

An article in Canadian Architect calls for building codes to “get with the times” as climate risks intensify.

While essential, the codes establish minimum life-safety standards rather than focusing on durability, energy performance, or resilience. Roofs designed to code minimums may meet compliance requirements but could still underperform in real-world climate conditions.

It begs the question – do we need higher standards for building codes as the climate crisis worsens to better incorporate resilience in buildings?

For example, a voluntary standard exists for wind and drainage for commercial roofs in CSA A123.26, Performance Requirements for Climate Resilience of Low Slope Membrane Roofing Systems, setting the stage for designers to meet future climate changes.

Even when a design concept is sound and up to code, value engineering often targets roofing systems for cost reductions, meaning that materials could be downgraded, assemblies altered, and performance characteristics diminished. In the age of climate change, this could lead to faster wear and tear on the roofing components that range from small fixes to catastrophic damage.

This practice must change so that enduring roof system performance is top of mind in both new construction and roof retrofit projects.

When roof performance is prioritized first, ancillary uses can succeed without compromising its performance or the building envelope.

Balancing Roof Performance with Ancillary Uses

Ancillary roof uses add extra environmental, social, and economic value to commercial and institutional buildings, but these uses must be integrated into a long-term roof performance strategy, not layered on as an afterthought. Roofs overburdened with inadequate drainage, insufficient wind resistance, or minimal insulation are far more likely to fail.

Mitigating competing priorities requires informed decision-making, supported by qualified roof consultants and performance-driven standards that anticipate future climate conditions, energy costs, and technological advancements.

When roof performance is prioritized first, ancillary uses can succeed without compromising its performance or the building envelope.

Institutional and commercial roofs are increasingly central to climate resilience strategies, and the choices engineers, designers, building owners, and property managers make today about design standards, materials, insulation levels, and maintenance will be tested throughout the structure’s lifespan.

Those who prioritize resilient, high-performing roof systems now will be better positioned to protect their property, maintain operations, and successfully adapt their building to a shifting climate in the long run.

The Pretium Way

At Pretium, we work directly with you to understand your roofing needs and develop tailored solutions. Our roofing experts assess roof conditions and identity optimal replacement and retrofit approaches, considering forward-looking performance standards. To learn more about Pretium’s roofing projects, check out some of our featured projects, like 111 Scotia Court, Whitby: https://pretiumengineering.com/projects/111-scotia-court-whitby/.

Published on July 24, 2026

Building Envelope Investigations: Finding the Source of Leaks and Moisture Issues

Building and Structural Restoration

How Engineers Manage Water Intrusion to Prevent the Need for Major Building Repairs

The impacts of water on the building envelope are often insidious in nature – what starts as just a small gap in sealant, poorly detailed flashing, or a hairline crack likely won’t stay that way for long.

Whether it enters after damage from a torrential storm or via a gradual leak, moisture will slowly compromise building materials over time. Once this damage is visible, the underlying issue may have spread well beyond its original source, turning a once simple repair into a much larger and more expensive problem.

It’s a pattern Pretium engineers specializing in building and structural restoration see time and time again during building envelope investigations.

Luckily, water damage isn’t inevitable. We have strategies for designing, inspecting and maintaining building envelopes and moisture barriers in ways that dramatically reduce the risk of long-term deterioration and structure-wide damage.

Leakage investigation including testing at a window.
Leakage investigation including testing at a window.

Design buildings assuming water will want to get in

Water doesn’t always behave the way we expect. It doesn’t play by the rules of gravity and just drip down – in its various forms, water can move horizontally along structural members, rise through capillary action, wick through porous materials and follow concealed pathways.

That’s why successful building envelope design starts with the assumption that water will eventually find a way in.

Rather than relying on a single barrier to keep a building dry forever, resilient building envelopes use multiple strategies to keep interiors dry.

Air and water leakage testing at the operable sashes of a window.
Air and water leakage testing at the operable sashes of a window.

Use multiple means of resistance and layers of defence

No single building envelope component can completely keep water leaks at bay.

Flashings, drainage planes, air and water barriers, rainscreens, sealants, and carefully detailed transitions all work in tandem to protect buildings from moisture intrusion.

This layered approach creates redundancy throughout the assembly, so if one component becomes compromised, others will continue to protect more vulnerable building materials. While water typically follows the path of least resistance, that path can shift with wind pressure, temperature, building movement, and changes in material properties.

Once moisture reaches the building structure, the impacts will vary by material. Wood can rot, steel can corrode, freeze-thaw cycles can accelerate deterioration and prolonged dampness will create ideal conditions for mould growth.

Infrared thermography showing locations of potential leaks on a roof.
Infrared thermography showing locations of potential leaks on a roof.

Inspect defense layers often to monitor for potential water issues

Even the best-designed building envelope requires regular attention as components age, drainage paths get blocked, and buildings shift over time, creating new opportunities for water intrusion.

That’s why routine inspections are essential. At minimum, buildings should be reviewed once a year, ideally before and/or after winter, when freeze–thaw cycles and snow loads tend to expose vulnerabilities or accelerate existing wear.

If an inspection identifies signs of a leak, or if occupants report recurring leaks, it’s important to complete a full building envelope investigation. Identifying the true source of a leak early can significantly reduce the extent and cost of future repairs.

There’s a saying in building science that “the devil is in the details,” and nowhere is that more evident than during a leak investigation. Water rarely behaves in a straightforward way once it enters an assembly, often travelling along hidden interfaces and structural elements before revealing itself. Being able to think like water can help engineers uncover the source of a leak so they can recommend repairs.

Deteriorated wood framing below a window, caused by ongoing leakage.
Deteriorated wood framing below a window, caused by ongoing leakage.

Carry out building envelope repairs without delay

Once moisture enters a building assembly, deterioration can continue until the problem is addressed, weakening materials, spreading damage to adjacent components, and escalating repair costs.

Addressing deficiencies as soon as they’re identified is one of the most effective ways to protect both the building envelope and the long-term value of the asset.

Water will always look for a way in, but with thoughtful design, multiple layers of defence, routine inspections and timely repairs, building owners can prevent existing minor moisture issues from ballooning into major building failures.

Published on July 20, 2026
Mitchell Cornwall

Mitchell Cornwall

Project Coordinator
Mitchell Cornwall

Mitchell strives to deliver a well-designed built solution through the integration of in-depth evaluations, onsite testing, and well-documented reporting. Mitchell values strong communication, client relations, and prioritizing health and safety standards on every project.  He aims to promote building science and restoration services that foster long-term solutions and exceed the expectation of the client’s needs, and he looks forward to growing his technical understanding within the industry and expanding his professional development.

Services
Building and Structural Restoration
Office Location
Kitchener
Education
Bachelor of Engineering (B.Eng.), Architectural, Conservation and Sustainability Engineering, Carleton University
Steven P. Bourdeau

Steven P. Bourdeau, RRO, CCCA, CSP

Project Principle
Steven P. Bourdeau

Steven investigates and consults on the design, inspection, testing, and maintenance of roofing and building envelope systems, including mould and asbestos investigation and remediation. Steven manages the sales and marketing for and is directly involved in all aspects of roof analysis, failure investigation, plans and specifications, quality assurance, site review, pre-construction design review and testing, inclusive of thermal infrared surveys.

Services
Roofing Building and Structural Restoration
Office Location
Burlington
Education
Ryerson Polytechnic University – Advanced Architectural Technology, Marketing Management, and Advertising Programs
Association
Construction Specifications Canada | Devis de Construction Canada
International Institute of Building Enclosure Consultants
Violet Cotton

Violet Cotton, B.A.Sc.

Project Coordinator
Violet Cotton

Violet grew up around her family’s general contracting business, inspiring her interest in building performance. She graduated with distinction from the University of Waterloo’s Environmental Engineering program and values professional development and lifelong learning. An outgoing team member, Violet is passionate about fostering strong communication and enhancing project efficiency.

Services
Building and Structural Restoration
Office Location
Kitchener
Education
Bachelor of Applied Science (B.A.Sc.), Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo
Mechanical Systems – HVAC and the Building Envelope, University of Toronto School of Continuing Studies

Keeping Condo Residents Comfortable During Window Wall Replacement

Building and Structural Restoration

A Window Into How Pretium Minimized Disruptions While Renovating the Rosedale Glen Condos

There’s no easy way around it – carrying out window wall and other fenestration replacements at a multifamily building, while essential to maintain the safety, energy efficiency, and aesthetics of multifamily buildings, can be disruptive to property managers, condo boards, and especially residents.

While not possible to eliminate, it is possible to mitigate disturbances and expenditures through thoughtful preparation, careful planning and ongoing communication with all parties.

That’s how Pretium Engineering managed our window wall replacement program at the Rosedale Glen Condos, a then 40-year-old development near Mt. Pleasant Road and Rosedale Valley Road in Toronto, Ontario.

This post will explore the details on how we kept residents in place and managed the budget while conducting a complete replacement program throughout the building’s two towers.

1. Understanding the Assignment Before Taking Action

A solid understanding of the project requirements is integral to minimising disruptions due to work. This preparation goes far beyond the typical reserve fund study (a high-level look for the purposes of capital planning) which is insufficiently detailed to adequately plan for such large capital undertakings.

At Pretium, we intentionally design replacement programs around minimizing resident disruption.

A component specific condition assessment was undertaken to take a deep dive into the condition of the windows to understand their current condition and unique problems to develop a site-specific repair plan, associated budget forecast and building out of replacement timelines.

This process is best completed a minimum of five years before the scheduled replacements to provide time for capital contributions of the building residents to be modified to suit the budget forecast input into the buildings reserve fund plan. Due to site-specific concerns, this process needed to be accelerated which required effective communication between the residents and condo board to swiftly implement the replacement program.

To reduce potential for future project delays, we did not limit our interior review of the window system to a handful of suites. We reviewed all of the condos’ 180 suites, examining the state of sliding doors and window walls. We identified the existing insulation system and how it interacted with the original glazing system, made from aluminum-framed window walls with a combination of fixed insulated glazing units and single pane horizontal sliders.

This information was valuable during the design process but proved invaluable during the construction process. A true understanding of the assignment to work within an occupied residential building requires an understanding of each unique suite. Reviewing all suites prior to the work created a database of unique conditions (cabinets in front of windows, mirrors adjacent windows, custom trim work, etc.) which were communicated with the contractor early to reduce costly delays.

Once this thorough investigation was complete, we determined that we would need to remove and dispose of all existing windows, doors, spandrels, interior drywall at the jambs, ceiling finishes at the head, flooring at sills, and accessories. Additionally, we identified unique conditions which would have a significant impact on project cost if not given due consideration during the design process.

For example, the original window system was an early version of a curtain wall system. Changing the building to a window wall system, as necessitated by site conditions and budget, provided unique challenges which needed to be appropriately managed to achieve project schedule, budget, and long-term performance.

Armed with information, we designed a renovation program to install new aluminum-framed systems at all windows, doors, and spandrels within the existing residential building.

2. Managing and Communicating Expectations

The process of assessing the building took time, but it was this exploratory period that allowed us to accurately forecast project costs and plan the job in such a way to minimize disruption to residents, a primary constraint of the building stakeholders.

At Pretium, we intentionally design replacement programs around minimizing resident disruption. To achieve this goal, we coordinated with the contractor to schedule and phase the work so that we replaced all elements within a suite concurrently. Through simultaneous work, access periods and associated disruption to each suite was minimized. Such scheduling is important, yet difficult to achieve and requires foresight and diligent execution by the project team to navigate roof anchor limitations, power supply, security, and other practical considerations.

With the help of property management, an information session was held with building residents to communicate expectations of the project early. Residents were further informed about impending renovations on a week-by-week basis, communicating regularly as the program progressed to allow each Suite to prepare accordingly.

Through effective communication leading up to the time of replacement, once the contractor knocked on their door, the suite was prepared for a window replacement and the suite resident made plans to vacate the suite for the day. The process was optimized to keep each resident out of the suite for one day with the suite always habitable at the end of each workday: no inconvenience of costly offsite lodging requirements for the residents. Through concurrent window and sliding door replacements, each suite was limited to a 10-working day window from the moment the contractor knocks on the door to the time they say their goodbye to a finished interior.

This communication system prepared the stakeholders for a dynamic schedule that evolved as complications arose – and they always will. A successful project is one which can accommodate the unexpected. Examples of situations which required accommodation were changing access and mobilization area limitations, concealed slab edge conditions with a dash of a global pandemic for good measure. Execution of such a technically complicated project which required the aging population of the building to safely vacate the suites during periods of COVID, all while maintaining the pre-COVID budget is perhaps the greatest testament possible for effective communication.

3. Working Smarter, Not Harder

As the financial authority, the condo board’s main concern for this project was associated costs keeping the required special assessment for the residents reasonable. Pretium takes a realistic financial outlook for any of our projects; it would be a disservice to all parties to underestimate the project costing even if this leads to difficult conversations. Pretium manages expectations by requiring the board to allocate contingency allowances or prepare to access condo reserves if circumstances require the budget to increase.

The long-term performance of any window system directly depends on how the window is tied into the adjacent building elements. The conventional tie-in details for these window systems would require the removal of all balcony railings and the existing brick adjacent to the windows which would carry a cost of several million dollars.

Through smart, well conceived detailing, Pretium was able to develop tie-in details to allow for tie-in to adjacent systems which remained in place without sacrificing long-term performance. By working smarter, Pretium was able to make this program financially viable for the residents of Rosedale Glen.

4. A Winning Window Replacement Strategy

Over the course of three COVID-filled years, the project team completed approximately 4,080 m2 of window wall, door, and accessory replacements throughout the Rosedale Glen Condos.

Through our developed fenestration renovation program, we effectively increased the building’s thermal performance, improved air tightness, and reduced annual energy costs. Past complaints of thermal discomfort during the shoulder seasons have been addressed and the interior aesthetic was significantly improved leading to positive impacts to resale values and quality of life for the residents of the building.

Methodical preparation and constant communication allowed us to keep property managers abreast of developments. It also helped us to find cost savings while improving the exterior aesthetic of the building – a delight to all, but especially, to the condo board.

We kept residents happy and in their homes both during and after the work was carried out. This is always an important consideration made more significant considering execution during a global pandemic. Surveys completed after the upgrades found that residents had an improved sense of comfort in their suites – the highest praise we could expect for a job well done.

Published on September 16, 2025
Robert (Bob) Vertatschitsch

Robert (Bob) Vertatschitsch, M.A.A.T.O

Project Principal
Robert (Bob) Vertatschitsch

Bob believes that a true understanding of the client’s objectives provides the foundation for successful projects and solid partnerships. Bob strives to bring the best in technical expertise together with a practical and innovative approach to building restoration.

Services
Building and Structural Restoration
Office Location
Burlington
Education
Residential HVAC Design, 1984
Architectural Technology Dipl, Mohawk College, 1982
Association
Association of Architectural Technologists of Ontario (since 1988)
Past President, Wentworth Standard Condominium Corporation No. 380